‘In a democracy, the individual enjoys not only the ultimate power but carries the ultimate responsibility.’
– Norman Cousins (1915-1990). He was an American political journalist, author, professor, and world peace advocate who served as the editor-in-chief of the well-known magazine The Saturday Review for over 35 years. Cousins was known for his influential writings on topics such as world peace, nuclear disarmament, and the role of media in shaping public opinion.
The Sarawak Legislative Assembly (DUN) has introduced changes to its Standing Orders, which were tabled and passed during the just-concluded sitting.
These updates represent an important step in improving the state’s legislative governance. The changes are set to enhance the integrity and effectiveness of parliamentary procedures amid swiftly evolving political and technological landscapes.
The revisions, which include changes to Standing Orders 20, 32(10), 40(3), 86, and 90, are designed to ensure that any allegations are relevant and supported by evidence.
In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, where social media has become a platform for instant reactions and personal opinions, the sanctity of legislative discourse faces new challenges.
Social media has changed how information spreads, giving the public instant, often unfiltered, access to parliamentary proceedings and giving individual members a wide-reaching platform.
This openness has obvious benefits, but it also comes with risks. The fast-paced and intense nature of social media can influence public opinion in ways that may not align with the respect and decorum expected in legislative discussions.
These amendments, tabled by Tourism, Creative Industry and Performing Arts Minister, Datuk Seri Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah, will help the DUN address gaps that allow unverified allegations and unchecked social media critiques to impact the legislative process and influence public opinion.
The minister has expressed concern over certain members of the august House using social media to criticise the Speaker’s rulings immediately after sessions adjourn. He noted that these critiques often contain vitriolic and sarcastic remarks.
This behaviour not only undermines the authority of the Speaker but risks reducing complex legislative debates to emotive soundbites that may polarise rather than inform.
By requiring allegations to be substantiated within the August House and addressing the misuse of platforms that have allowed some members to mock or undermine Speaker rulings, the DUN reinforces the principle that respectful, evidence-based discourse is essential to democracy.
In essence, these amendments are more than procedural housekeeping. They represent a proactive stance on maintaining decorum within the assembly, demonstrating accountability to the public and refocusing attention on constructive governance.
These amendments also serve as a reminder to all the Honourable Members of the August House of their responsibility to represent Sarawak’s diverse community.
We must all be aware that while digital tools enable broader engagement, they require a renewed commitment to the principles that keep democracy strong.
By upholding the decorum and authority of the DUN, Sarawak’s lawmakers are working to keep the assembly a respected place where real progress can happen in a way that reflects the values of the people they serve.
However, with this power comes the responsibility to communicate respectfully and to prioritise the collective good over personal grievances.
As Abdul Karim pointed out, the august House is the highest legislative authority in the state, and its proceedings are imbued with significance, influencing the social and political fabric of Sarawak’s multi-ethnic community.
Misrepresentation or derogatory remarks stemming from these proceedings, especially when amplified through the media, threaten the unity and harmony foundational to effective governance in a diverse society.
Beyond preserving decorum, the amendments call for respect for institutional integrity. The DUN represents a democratic institution with decisions that impact the lives of millions, and as such, its deliberations and rulings require respect and compliance.
The debate around amending Standing Orders is not solely about controlling behaviour but about upholding the dignity of public office and ensuring that legislators act in a manner that serves the broader goals of unity and progress.
When a member ridicules a Speaker’s ruling, they are not just criticizing a specific decision but also eroding the institution’s credibility.
Therefore, these amendments act as safeguards to remind members that their words and actions extend beyond the chambers of the Dewan and resonate within the public consciousness.
As technology blurs the line between private and public conversations, this motion to amend the Standing Orders raises a key question: how do lawmakers conduct themselves not only in the Dewan but also in the public eye?
The amendments show a commitment to a disciplined, respectful, and effective model of governance that values constructive dialogue and responsible representation.
By taking this action, the legislative assembly of Sarawak is exemplifying effective strategies for addressing governance challenges in the digital era while upholding the integrity of democratic institutions, potentially influencing other state assemblies and national bodies.
The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the New Sarawak Tribune.
