BASEL (Switzerland): Basel voters on Sunday overwhelmingly approved the city putting up nearly $40 million towards hosting next year’s Eurovision Song Contest, meaning the giant TV extravaganza will go ahead with its customary full-on razzmatazz.
Final results showed 66.6 per cent of voters in the Swiss city backed putting taxpayers’ cash into staging Eurovision 2025. The turnout was 57 per cent.
“I am delighted for Basel and for the project team, which has already invested a lot of passion in organising the Eurovision Song Contest 2025,” Basel-City regional president Conradin Cramer told AFP.
“For Basel, the ‘Yes’ means that we will be able to welcome visitors from Switzerland and Europe with open arms and offer them a wonderful programme.”
Swiss singer Nemo won Eurovision 2024 with “The Code”, giving Switzerland the right to host next year’s 69th edition.
Basel, on the northern border with France and Germany, was selected to stage the kitsch
event, which comes with a guaranteed vast international TV audience.
However, the small, ultra-conservative, Christian fundamentalist Federal Democratic Union of Switzerland (EDU) party garnered enough signatures to secure a referendum on whether the 34.96 million Swiss francs ($39.5 million) approved by regional authorities for the show should be granted.
EDU board member Philippe Karoubi said the competition had become “completely instrumentalised to promote ideologies” like “wokeism” and trans rights.
He slammed the contest for staging what he called “blasphemous performances”, some verging on “the occult”.
Eurovision is a non-profit event, mostly financed by weighted contributions from participating public service broadcasters.
However, Eurovision says that “given the benefits that will flow” to host cities, they must also make a contribution.
Based on the last two contests in Liverpool and Malmo, Basel hopes to make about 60 million Swiss francs from the event, in particular in tourism and hospitality.
The contest will be staged at the St. Jakobshalle indoor arena, with semi-finals set for May 13 and 15, while the final is to take place on May 17.
Fans without golden tickets for the arena will be able to flock to the 40,000-capacity St. Jakob-Park football stadium across the street to watch the final on a giant screen, and see performances by former Eurovision stars.
Meanwhile the Steinenvorstadt district, known for its bars and cinemas, will be transformed into “Eurovision Street”.
Had voters rejected granting the money, Eurovision 2025 would have been scaled right back to just the show itself, with no public events outside the main venue.
Across Switzerland in national votes, the Swiss rejected expand the country’s motorways at key congestion points, and giving greater powers to landlords.
Final results showed 52.7 per cent had voted against plans to widen sections of the A1 motorway, and build tunnels in St. Gallen and Schaffhausen and under the Rhine in Basel.
The government and the parliament wanted to ease bottlenecks on six motorway stretches, with the volume of traffic having doubled since 1990.
The projects were estimated to cost 4.9 billion Swiss francs ($5.5 billion).
The Green Party called it a huge victory against an outdated transport policy.
“Traffic is one of the main causes of carbon dioxide emissions and plays a direct role in global warming,” lawmaker Delphine Klopfenstein Broggini said in a statement.
“This money must be invested in protection against the consequences of global warming, particularly in mountain regions.”
Pierre-Andre Page, a lawmaker with the hard-right Swiss People’s Party, said he was “shocked” by the results.
“We will soon have 10 million inhabitants. And these bottlenecks will increase further,” he told RTS television.
The Swiss also rejected two separate projects aimed at giving landlords more flexibility, one on terminating leases (by 53.8 per cent) and the other on limiting sub-letting (by 51.6 per cent).
Nearly 60 per cent of people in Switzerland are tenants.
“Today’s results are a slap in the face for the real estate lobby, which continues to extend its grip on the housing market by maximising its profits at the expense of tenants,” said ASLOCA, a major tenants’ association. – AFP
