California orders Nestle to stop ‘unlawful’ bottling water from springs

Facebook
X
WhatsApp
Telegram
Email
A worker loads bottled water for delivery at the Arrowhead Bottled Water Delivery center on September 20, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. Photo: AFP

LET’S READ SUARA SARAWAK/ NEW SARAWAK TRIBUNE E-PAPER FOR FREE AS ​​EARLY AS 2 AM EVERY DAY. CLICK LINK

SACRAMENTO: The water regulator of the US state of California ruled on Tuesday that the beverage corporate giant Nestle had no legal right to the water it had diverted and bottled from mountain springs for over 100 years, reported Xinhua.

The bottled water is sold under Arrowhead, a household brand whose label reads “Since 1894”. Nestle sold the bottled water business in 2021 and Nestle Waters North America began operating under the new name BlueTriton Brands later.

California State Water Resources Control Board ordered the company to stop drawing water for bottling from most of its water-collection sites in the San Bernardino Mountains by Nov 1. The company has 30 days to appeal to the board.

Investigations began in 2015 when the state board received a number of complaints against Nestle Waters North America from individuals and organisations, as well as a petition signed by hundreds of people, according to the agency’s documents.

See also  India offers seven choppers to Philippine coast guard

The complaints accuse Nestle of diverting water without a valid right and unreasonably using water, among other allegations.

After eight years of investigation, including dozens of hearings, the board determined on Tuesday that BlueTriton does not have permission to use the water.

The company disagreed, saying its predecessors had been doing so for more than 125 years. It also argued that it takes water that is underground and that the state water board does not have the authority to regulate groundwater.

BlueTriton Brands said it would sue to block the order.

Nestle had a federal “special use” permit allowing it to use its pipeline and other water infrastructure in the national forest. But the permit does not grant use of water.

Environmental groups also accused the company of taking water from an important creek that is a habitat for wildlife and helps protect the area from wildfires.

The water right, or the legal underpinning to use water, has become controversial in California in recent years as the state suffers from frequent and extreme droughts and wildfires.

See also  UN environment talks open under shadow of plane crash

Many Native American Tribes and environmental justice organisations allege that the state fundamentally favours early white settlers at the expense of indigenous people and the environment.

Last month, US federal environmental authorities decided to investigate whether California State Water Resources Control Board discriminated against Native Americans and other people of colour by failing to protect the water quality of San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. – BERNAMA-XINHUA

Download from Apple Store or Play Store.