Free speech vs. house rules

Facebook
X
WhatsApp
Telegram
Email
Abdul Karim (centre) with his officers browse a document upon his arrival. Photo: Mohd Alif Noni

LET’S READ SUARA SARAWAK/ NEW SARAWAK TRIBUNE E-PAPER FOR FREE AS ​​EARLY AS 2 AM EVERY DAY. CLICK LINK

A heated debate erupted in the Sarawak Legislative Assembly (DUN) yesterday (Nov 12) as lawmakers clashed over proposed amendments to the Standing Orders.

The contentious issue centred on a proposed amendment to Standing Order 20, which would empower the Speaker to compel members to verify statements made in newspapers, online news portals, social media, or other online platforms.

Chong Chieng Jen (DAP-Padungan) argued that the proposed amendment was overly broad, potentially stifling free speech.

“I can accept if the Minister will be kind enough and reasonable enough to take out the words – the newspapers, online news portals. Take those out and I can accept the clause about social media, online platforms,” he said.

However, Datuk Ibrahim Baki (GPS-Satok) dismissed Chong’s concerns, accusing him of being overly emotional.

DUN Speaker Tan Sri Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar weighed in, emphasising the need for decorum and responsible speech within the House.

“You are an honourable member of this August House. You cannot be blasé, using seditious, pretentious, libellous words and all that,” he said.

See also  SMK Merbau to represent M’sia

Asfia further clarified that while members are free to speak without fear or favour, they must do so with facts.

“You can speak without fear or favor, but with facts,” he said.

The debate intensified as the Speaker called on the Minister to wind up the motion.

“Now, you (Chong) demonstrate your conduct. That is why the Standing Order has to be regulated. This type of conduct. You speak for yourself,” Asfia said.

Earlier, Tourism, Creative Industry, and Performing Arts Minister Datuk Seri Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah had introduced the motion to amend several Standing Orders, citing the need to address the misuse of social media and press conferences.

In his winding-up speech, Abdul Karim clarified that the amendments were not intended to suppress or intimidate members but to uphold the dignity and integrity of the House.

“The goal is to encourage truthfulness and accountability. That is the purpose of this motion,” he said.

Download from Apple Store or Play Store.