‘The vote is the most powerful instrument ever devised by man for breaking down injustice and destroying the terrible walls which imprison men because they are different from other men.’
– Lyndon B. Johnson (1908-973); the 36th President of the United States of America, serving from 1963 to 1969
APART from GPS, there are no clear or formidable opposition parties in the Jepak by-election.
Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK) and Parti Aspirasi Rakyat Sarawak (ASPIRASI) have failed to make any significant impact during the campaign period.
PBK relied on press statements and social media posts to attack GPS but its allegations did not gain much traction as they were viewed as preposterous.
ASPIRASI’s campaign faced setbacks when its candidate was investigated by the Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) for allegedly distributing rice packets to voters, which could be seen as an act of enticing voters through gifts.
Therefore, the question is not whether GPS will win the by-election but rather by how much majority it will retain Jepak.
Historically, GPS has a stronghold on the constituency, and it is looking to replicate or improve its record in the last state election.
Although a simple victory may be enough, a landslide victory carries several potential advantages and benefits for the winning party or candidate.
Firstly, there is the matter of mandate and legitimacy, signalling a clear mandate from the electorate, demonstrating strong support for the winning party or candidate. This can enhance its legitimacy and provide a strong basis for governing with confidence.
A big victory can provide the winning party or candidate with increased political capital, leading to more leverage in negotiations, policy-making and implementing its agenda, as it can argue that it has a broad popular mandate to do so.
A landslide victory can also help create a sense of stability and unity within the winning party; have a demoralising effect on the opposing parties or candidates; and it can enhance the public perception and image of the winning party or candidate.
The low turnout figures in recent elections are a concern as people may feel jaded with politics due to the state of political instability in the country. Apart from the political instability, several other factors could contribute to the decreased participation in elections. These factors include voter apathy, disillusionment with political parties and candidates, lack of trust in the electoral process, and a perception that individual votes may not make a significant difference.
One factor contributing to low turnout is voter apathy, which refers to a lack of interest or motivation among eligible voters to participate in the electoral process. This could stem from a sense of detachment or disengagement from politics, where individuals may feel that their voices or votes do not matter, or politicians do not adequately represent their interests. Voter apathy can be exacerbated when there is a perceived lack of meaningful choice among candidates or when political campaigns fail to address key issues that resonate with the electorate.
Disillusionment with political parties and candidates is another factor that can discourage people from voting. When citizens feel that political parties or candidates do not align with their values or fail to address pressing concerns, they may choose not to participate in the electoral process as a form of protest or as a way to express their dissatisfaction. Scandals, corruption or a lack of transparency within the political system can further erode trust and contribute to disillusionment.
There is a worry that complacency may set in among voters in Jepak, given the belief that GPS will retain the seat regardless. This belief implies a perception of the party’s dominance or strong influence in the region, which might lead some voters to think that their votes won’t make a significant difference.
To expand on the statement, it’s important to note that complacency among voters can have significant consequences for the democratic process. When voters become complacent and disengaged, it can undermine the principles of fair representation and citizen participation. Every eligible voter’s participation is crucial in ensuring that the elected representatives truly reflect the will of the people.
In this context, it’s worth exploring the reasons behind the perceived dominance of GPS in Jepak. It could be due to a variety of factors such as historical voting patterns, strong party machinery, an incumbent advantage, or a perception of effective governance by GPS in the past. However, it’s essential to remember that electoral outcomes are not predetermined and voter turnout and preferences can shift over time.
By assuming that GPS will retain the seat uncontested, voters may unintentionally contribute to the perpetuation of a status quo that might not accurately represent their evolving needs and aspirations. Voters must remain engaged, informed and active in the political process to ensure that their voices are heard and their concerns are addressed by their elected representatives.
To address this concern, it becomes necessary to encourage voter education, civic awareness, and participation. Efforts can be made to inform voters about the importance of their votes, the potential for political change, and the need for a diverse and competitive political landscape. Emphasising the significance of the electoral process and promoting transparency and accountability in politics can help counter complacency and motivate voters to exercise their democratic rights.
Overall, while the belief that a certain political party will retain a seat can create a sense of complacency among voters, it is crucial to remind individuals that every vote matters and can influence the democratic process. Encouraging active citizenship and civic engagement can help foster a healthy and vibrant democracy, ensuring that the elected representatives truly reflect the will of the people.
In addition to grassroots engagement and meeting the people of Jepak, GPS has adopted a different approach compared to the prevailing trend of mudslinging in Malaysian politics. The party not only aims for its candidate to win but also places a strong emphasis on the significance of voters exercising their democratic right by turning up on polling day.
The phrase “in addition to” highlights that GPS is undertaking activities beyond grassroots engagement and meetings. It is likely to implement various strategies to connect with the electorate and understand their concerns, suggestions and aspirations. This could include initiatives such as town hall meetings, door-to-door campaigns, public forums or community events. By actively engaging with the people of Jepak, GPS demonstrates a commitment to understand their needs and work towards addressing them.
Furthermore, the phrase “in addition to” suggests that GPS recognises the prevalent issue of mudslinging in Malaysian politics. Mudsliding refers to the act of making malicious or damaging statements about one’s opponents during an election campaign. By choosing a different approach, GPS aims to distance itself from this negative and divisive practice. This alternative strategy is seen as a breath of fresh air, implying that it brings a new perspective and a more positive tone to the political landscape.
GPS’s emphasis on voters exercising their democratic right by turning up on polling day reflects its commitment to democratic values and the importance of citizen participation in the electoral process. By encouraging voter turnout, GPS actively seeks to empower the electorate and ensure their voices are heard. This approach acknowledges that elections are not only about winning but also about fostering a vibrant and engaged democracy.
Overall, GPS’ campaign strategy goes beyond mere political rhetoric and focuses on genuine engagement with the people of Jepak. By choosing a different path and placing value on voter participation, GPS aims to bring about a positive change in Malaysian politics while ensuring that the democratic process is upheld.
The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the New Sarawak Tribune.
