KUCHING: Sarawak has never relinquished its rights over oil and gas resources on its continental shelf, asserting that these resources are the state’s property both legally and historically, says political observer Datuk Peter Minos.
Responding to former law minister Zaid Ibrahim’s remarks about the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ruling on Batu Puteh, Minos stressed that the circumstances of that case do not weaken Sarawak’s claims.
He pointed out that Singapore’s claim to Batu Puteh was upheld based on the principle of estoppel, as Malaysia had shown no interest in the island or its lighthouse until Singapore staked its claim.
“Hence, Singapore won. The oil and gas found beneath Sarawak’s soil and seabed have always belonged to the state, even before their discovery.
“We did not abandon these rights—we were simply unaware of the resources until the 1970s when Petronas identified them,” Minos told the New Sarawak Tribune.
He highlighted that Sarawak’s claims are supported by the Oil Mining Ordinance of 1956, which is still in effect. Even without the Ordinance, he argued, international law would affirm Sarawak’s ownership of its natural resources.
He added that Petronas cannot draw comparisons between Sarawak’s oil and gas rights and the Batu Puteh case, as the legal and contextual differences are significant.
Sarawak’s consistent assertion of its rights, he said, is exemplified by its recent victory in the Sales Tax case against Petronas.
Minos urged Petronas and the federal government to respect Sarawak’s laws and acknowledge the state’s need for resources to drive development.
“Petronas must recognise that Sarawak requires funds for its development. Sarawak’s rights cannot be challenged, whether in or out of court.
“Despite being a financial powerhouse, Petronas must respect Sarawak’s rights and laws. Failure to do so could strain relations between Sarawak and the federal government—an outcome that benefits no one.”
