YOU may have observed a global shift towards eco-friendliness in recent times — or at least, it may seem that way. However, if you’ve ever chosen a product based on “natural” or recycled-looking packaging, you might have fallen prey to greenwashing.
Greenwashing involves presenting brands as more sustainable than they truly are.
This can encompass deceptive marketing tactics, misguided public relations stunts, or simply altering the packaging of an existing product while maintaining unsustainable ingredients or practices.
It serves as a method for companies to convey a facade of environmental concern while simultaneously boosting their profits, capitalising on the willingness of eco-conscious consumers to spend more on sustainable products.
Recall the controversy from 2019 when McDonald’s introduced paper straws that, as it turned out, were non-recyclable.
Beyond the environmentally questionable act of cutting down trees for disposable straws, this incident exemplified a large corporation feigning action on an issue — plastic pollution in this case — without implementing any substantive changes.
Another cynical tactic in greenwashing involves affixing a green label to a product to create the illusion of sustainability or health, as seen with Coca-Cola’s introduction of Coca-Cola Life — a beverage containing 6.6% sugar and far from a healthy choice. Drinking a significant amount of it would likely result in anything but a healthy life.
It is common to use sustainability buzzwords or phrases like “organic,” “natural,” or “eco-friendly” which can easily be slapped onto items, creating a false sense of environmental responsibility.
Without proper regulations and oversight, consumers are left vulnerable to such deceptive practices.
In a region where traditional practices and ecological balance are integral parts of our culture, consumers often place high value on products that align with these principles.
Greenwashing not only exploits this sentiment but also risks eroding the trust between consumers and brands.
The domain of policy and regulation is rapidly evolving, with an increasing emphasis on addressing spurious environmental claims through litigation.
This involves not only national legal frameworks but also decisions rendered by multilateral bodies.
A noteworthy example is the case of BP, which, in 2020, had to retract a significant advertising campaign following a complaint from a public interest law firm.
The complaint alleged a violation of the OECD’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, asserting that the campaign created a misleading impression regarding BP’s transition to renewable energy and departure from fossil fuels.
However, consumer protection laws in this realm are occasionally deemed inadequate.
An analysis of the regulatory landscape in Thailand, for instance, concluded that the consumer protection law of Thailand is insufficient for resolving disputes that may arise concerning sustainability claims and labelling.
While some countries in Southeast Asia are taking steps to address green washing through regulatory frameworks, there is a need for regional collaboration to establish standardised guidelines.
This would not only protect consumers but also foster a genuine commitment to sustainability among businesses operating in the region.
As Southeast Asia marches towards a more sustainable future, the battle against greenwashing remains a significant challenge.
We live in an era where the clamour for eco-friendly alternatives grows louder, and so too does the need for consumer vigilance and informed decision-making become even more critical.
The proliferation of greenwashing erodes trust between consumers and companies, exacerbating scepticism and cynicism towards legitimate eco-friendly initiatives.
Furthermore, consumers wield significant influence through their purchasing power.
By supporting transparent and genuinely sustainable brands, individuals can drive meaningful change within the market, compelling companies to prioritise authenticity and accountability over profit-driven greenwashing.
Education also plays a pivotal role in empowering consumers to distinguish between genuine sustainability and deceptive marketing tactics.
Through public awareness campaigns and educational initiatives, consumers can become more adept at recognising greenwashing and demanding verifiable evidence of a product’s eco-friendly claims.
Ultimately, the fight against greenwashing requires a collective effort from consumers, regulatory bodies, and businesses alike.
Regulatory measures must be strengthened to curb deceptive marketing practices, while companies must uphold integrity and transparency in their sustainability endeavours.
In a world teetering on the brink of environmental crisis, the stakes are too high to allow greenwashing to continue unchecked.
As consumers, we hold the power to effect change through our choices. Let us wield that power wisely, demanding honesty, transparency and genuine sustainability from the products we purchase.
By raising awareness, holding businesses accountable and fostering a culture of transparency, the region can move beyond the mirage of greenwashing and build a truly eco-conscious marketplace that benefits both the environment and us, the consumer.
**Dr Marc Weissmann is from the School of Business, Faculty of Business, Design and Arts, Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus
The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the New Sarawak Tribune.
